A recent Huffingtonpost.com article by Stephanie Simon of Reuters quotes education activist Michelle Rhee,
“Schools don’t need more money, Rhee says; they need to be held accountable for how they spend it.”
Accountability, What’s Wrong With That?
Attention has been focused toward Rhee’s superPAC funded group “Students First”. It’s rumored that wealthy investors are on their backer’s list and cash has been easy to raise. Critics of Michelle Rhee would say that she’s a controversial figure in education. They say she shares anti-union sentiments and contempt for poorly performing teachers.
A former teacher herself, Michelle worked to dramatically increased students’ average scores from the 13th percentile to the 90th
The politics of a completely privatized school system is naturally debatable, but I do personally enjoy the idea of teachers getting rewarded for their efforts. Why doesn’t it make sense to keep an eye on reforming our education system at all times in the spirit of continuous improvement? Michelle is able to easily raise large amounts of money because her cause makes sense. Basically, Michelle Rhee is fighting for education accountability. Wouldn’t it make better sense if schools were more responsible with their resources and teachers were paid based on how their students test?






Follow William